Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a score of 79.3 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older, just a little bit heavier and thicker cellphone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a little bit larger screen. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S6 edge+ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture and a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.