Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is way heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's extremely thinner and much newer. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a much bigger screen and a better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture for better low light captures, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Force Edition. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Force Edition, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.