Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a global score of 78.8 against 77.4. The vivo X60 Pro design is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is way thicker and much heavier. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better display density.
Vivo X60 Pro features a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The vivo X60 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh. Vivo X60 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments, a much more MP camera in the back, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.