Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a general score of 85.5 against 77.4. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is way thicker and way heavier. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same resolution camera in the back, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures, better video frame rates and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.