Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro has a general score of 84.9, which is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. IPhone 11 Pro's design is extremely newer, but notably thicker and a lot heavier than Moto Z2 Play. The iPhone 11 Pro features a faster processor than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has 2 less processing cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436, a just a little higher display pixels density and a bit bigger display. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same (4K) video quality, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. IPhone 11 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3046mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 11 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.