Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-06-29 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is better than Moto Z2 Play, having an 86.6 score against 77.4. Even though iPhone SE (2022) is thicker than Moto Z2 Play, it's a bit lighter and also noticeably newer. The iPhone SE (2022) features a better performing processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone SE (2022) features a bit sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, although it has a lot lower resolution of 750 x 1334px, a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display. The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same video quality, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Moto Z2 Play has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a way better battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone SE (2022), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.