Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, but it is extremely thicker and heavier. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG V50 ThinQ has more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video quality and a same resolution back camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also has higher video frame rate and a larger aperture. The LG V50 ThinQ has improved battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ is more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.