Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play has a score of 77.4, which is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. Moto Z2 Play is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has less processing cores (but faster) and less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater screen density. Motorola Droid Turbo captures a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in low-light environments and worse 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a way higher 20.7 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Moto Z2 Play has much more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 30% greater battery size.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a better device, it is a little more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.