Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play, with a 77.9 score against 77.4. Although it's the best phone we are comparing here, we must note that it is also much older, heavier and a lot thicker. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit superior processor than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a GPU.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixel density. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Moto Z2 Play features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo has superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.