Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with an 81.2 score against 77.4. Motorola Edge 50's construction is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, although it's much thicker and heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit better pixels number in each inch of display, a bigger screen and a better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z2 Play has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.