Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Moto Z2 Play, with an 84.7 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A32 body is extremely newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, but it is a lot heavier and noticeably thicker. Moto Z2 Play counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a better screen density.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z2 Play has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A32. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy A32 captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A32 has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.