Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. Galaxy A60's body is newer, but much thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy A60's CPU is very similar to the Moto Z2 Play one, and although the Galaxy A60 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A60 counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite better pixels density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite larger screen. Galaxy A60 counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A60 also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 16 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A60 features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.