Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Moto Z2 Play, having a 91.8 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G construction is noticeably newer than Moto Z2 Play's, although it's incredibly thicker and notably heavier. The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little lower pixel count per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G has a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.