Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is a bit better than Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. Even though Galaxy A80 is newer than Moto Z2 Play, it is way thicker and much heavier. Galaxy A80 and Motorola Moto Z2 Play feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A80 has a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A80 has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy A80 features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking pictures in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much more MP back camera.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A80 has better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.