Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Moto Z2 Play, getting a 90.5 score against 77.4. The Galaxy A90 5G construction is incredibly newer, but thicker and noticeably heavier than the Moto Z2 Play. The Galaxy A90 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A90 5G has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Moto Z2 Play features a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a much better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.