Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-06-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and Gold |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy C9 Pro is a thicker and heavier device than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Moto Z2 Play counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, the Moto Z2 Play also counts with a just a little better pixels number in each screen inch.
The Moto Z2 Play has a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features greater battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity. The Moto Z2 Play shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way lower resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.