Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. The Galaxy M31s is a notably newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it's much heavier and noticeably thicker. The Galaxy M31s has a bit sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little higher pixel quantity per inch of display and a larger display.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31s has a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy M31s also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy M31s counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy M31s counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.