Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. Although it's the best in this review, we must highlight that it's also an older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution, a better display pixel density and a little bigger screen.
Moto Z2 Play has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto Z2 Play also has a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a way more MP back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S6 edge+'s battery life is just as good as the Moto Z2 Play one.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S6 edge+, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.