Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a general score of 77.8 against 77.4. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is notably newer and a lot thinner than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, although it's heavier. The Moto Z2 Play has a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a much larger display and a just a bit better screen density. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto Z2 Play, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.