Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-06-29 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, having a global score of 80.3 against 76.3. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Google Nexus 6P is a older, somewhat heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Nexus 6P has a little more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher display density. Moto Z3 Play counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Nexus 6P captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a better 12.3 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photographs.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Google Nexus 6P costs more than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.