Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2018-06-29 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 has a score of 77, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. The LG V20 is an older, heavier and just a little bit thicker device than Moto Z3 Play. LG V20 has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen density.
The LG V20 counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as the Moto Z3 Play, they have the same internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V20's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Moto Z3 Play, and although the LG V20 has 4 lesser cpu cores (but faster), they both have the same RAM memory amount.
LG V20 features a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG V20 also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels.
LG V20 has just a bit better battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V20 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.