Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Moto Z3 Play, getting an 83.7 score against 76.3. LG V50 ThinQ's design is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z3 Play. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little larger display, a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a greater pixels amount in each inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same video resolution and a 12 mega pixels back facing camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and higher video frame rate.
LG V50 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. LG V50 ThinQ counts with better battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.