Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, having a general score of 77.9 against 76.3. Even though Motorola DROID Turbo is a better cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, we must highlight that it's also a much older, somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker cellphone.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo has a way better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has lower 24 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Moto Z3 Play counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z3 Play also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo features superior battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.