Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, getting a 79.7 score against 76.3. Moto G Stylus's design is newer, but a lot thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a screen that's just as good as the screen in Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2300 resolution. Moto Z3 Play counts with a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto G Stylus has a better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also has a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The Moto G Stylus features longer battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Moto G Stylus is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.