Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 402 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is much better than Moto Z3 Play, having a global score of 84.7 against 76.3. The Galaxy A32 is a much newer phone than Moto Z3 Play, but it is way heavier and much thicker. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a greater storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 features a superior battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.