Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Moto Z3 Play, having a 91.8 score against 76.3. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a newer device than Moto Z3 Play, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bigger display. Galaxy A71 5G features a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.