Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is better than Moto Z3 Play's score of 76.3. Samsung Galaxy A80 is a newer device than the Moto Z3 Play, but it is a lot heavier and notably thicker. Galaxy A80 counts with a display that is just as good as Moto Z3 Play's display, because although the Galaxy A80 has a bit lower pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display.
Galaxy A80 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A80 features a better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Moto Z3 Play has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with greater battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.