Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is better than Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. Galaxy A90 5G's construction is newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, although it is thicker and incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A90 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Moto Z3 Play has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.