Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than Moto Z3 Play's general score of 76.3. The Galaxy C9 Pro is a heavier device than Moto Z3 Play, but both of them are 0.27inches thick. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite better screen pixels density. Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z3 Play takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with greater battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.