Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s is better than Moto Z3 Play, having a general score of 88 against 76.3. Galaxy M31s's construction is noticeably newer, but thicker and heavier than Moto Z3 Play. Galaxy M31s counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a quite bigger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a little bit better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy M31s has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality photos.
Galaxy M31s counts with a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 100% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.