Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Moto Z3 Play, getting a 77.8 score against 76.3. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than Moto Z3 Play, it's notably thinner and also extremely newer. Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a really superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a lot bigger screen, a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a little bit higher display density. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much better video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z3 Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z3 Play, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.