Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. Even though iPhone 8 is older and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3, it's design is still just a little lighter. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 8 has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z3, although it has a way lower 750 x 1334 resolution, a much smaller display and a little bit inferior pixel count in each inch of screen. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone 8, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Apple iPhone 8 has just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have a same resolution camera and the same video definition, the Apple iPhone 8 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Moto Z3 has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 65 percent greater battery size.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z3. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 8, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z3, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.