Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is a bit better than Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. Although it's the best we compare here, the Google Nexus 6P construction is noticeably older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than Moto Z3. The Motorola Moto Z3 has just a bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel quantity in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Google Nexus 6P has just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Nexus 6P also has a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3450mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z3. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z3, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.