Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is slightly better than LG V20, getting a 77.6 score against 77. The Motorola Moto Z3 is a newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG V20. Moto Z3 counts with a little better performance than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto Z3 also has a greater number of faster cores.
LG V20 has a little bit better display than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V20 and Moto Z3 feature quite similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both have exactly the same internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V20 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the LG V20 also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a lot better resolution camera and a larger sensor capturing better quality photographs.
The LG V20 features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Moto Z3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V20, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.