Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3's score of 77.6. The LG V30 is an older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker phone than Motorola Moto Z3. The LG V30 features a CPU that's very similar to the Moto Z3 one, both have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
LG V30 has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V30 also has a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch in the display. The LG V30's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Moto Z3's one, both of them have an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same internal memory.
LG V30 counts with a little longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The LG V30 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z3, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG V30 also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The LG V30 is a little more expensive than the Moto Z3, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.