Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 global score. The Moto Z3 body is a lot newer, somewhat lighter and much thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, counting with some extra features and performance tweaks.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a better looking display than Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels density.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Droid Turbo has improved battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better camera than Moto Z3, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.