Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3, having a score of 77.9 against 77.6. These phones use Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the older 4.4.4 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo's construction is way older, somewhat heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z3.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a brighter screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Moto Z3 features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better hardware performance than Moto Z3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less cpu cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Motorola DROID Turbo features superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo captures a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z3, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.