Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3's global score of 77.6. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 is extremely newer than Motorola Moto Z3, it's somewhat heavier and thicker.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 has a much better display than Moto Z3, because it has a better 1220 x 2712 resolution, a little larger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a larger aperture and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Moto Z3 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.