Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 402 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Moto Z3, getting an 84.7 score against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Moto Z3 comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Although the Samsung Galaxy A32 is extremely newer than the Moto Z3, it's incredibly thicker and notably heavier.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A32. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Moto Z3 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a much more mega-pixels camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.