Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is slightly better than the Moto Z3, with a score of 82.3 against 77.6. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Samsung Galaxy A60 is newer than the Moto Z3, it is just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy A60 features a screen that is just as good as the Moto Z3 one, although the Galaxy A60 also has a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little larger screen. The Moto Z3 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy A60 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A60 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and video, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A60 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.