Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is better than the Moto Z3's general score of 77.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A71 5G's design is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the Moto Z3.
The Moto Z3 and the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G feature incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Moto Z3 and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G have very similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a larger camera aperture and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a really longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is more expensive than Moto Z3, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.