Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3, getting a global score of 84.9 against 77.6. The Galaxy A80 design is newer, but extremely heavier and much thicker than Motorola Moto Z3. The Motorola Moto Z3 features a little faster processor than Galaxy A80, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Moto Z3 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A80 features a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video resolution, a F2 diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with greater battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.