Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-08-16 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Moto Z3, with a 90.5 score against 77.6. Galaxy A90 5G's design is newer, but a lot heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z3. The Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, while Moto Z3 works with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A90 5G and Motorola Moto Z3 count with very similar screens, because although the Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a way bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Moto Z3 features a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.