Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-08-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Moto Z3, with an 81 score against 77.6. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the older 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a somewhat heavier phone than the Moto Z3, but both have the same thickness.
The Moto Z3 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Moto Z3 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Moto Z3 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Moto Z3 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture and a much less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot higher video definition. The Moto Z3 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy C9 Pro has improved battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.