Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 297.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. These devices come with Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is extremely newer and a lot thinner than the Motorola Moto Z3's, but it's also much heavier.
Moto Z3 has a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Moto Z3, because it has a much bigger display, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a way better video resolution, a back camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution, a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a larger aperture to capture better captures in low light environments.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto Z3, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.