Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-16 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 297.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. Although vivo X60 Pro is notably newer than the Moto Z3, it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but vivo X60 Pro has older 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376. The Moto Z3 has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 40% greater battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.