Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gray and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z4, with a general score of 87.1 against 79.8. IPhone 8 Plus is better than Motorola Moto Z4, we must tell that it is also an older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier device. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus features just a bit better screen than Moto Z4, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, a quite smaller screen and a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
IPhone 8 Plus has a better CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Moto Z4 counts with a little bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto Z4 has a much better camera than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low light situations.
The Moto Z4 features a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 3600mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z4. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto Z4, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.