Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than Moto Z4, getting a general score of 82 against 79.8. The Apple iPhone XR is better than the Moto Z4, we must note that it is also a heavier and thicker phone. Apple iPhone XR counts with a superior CPU than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XR has a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z4, although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792px and a bit smaller display. The Moto Z4 counts with a superior camera than iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot higher resolution camera, a much bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
The Moto Z4 has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto Z4, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.