Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 global score. The Google Pixel 3 design is a bit thicker but somewhat lighter than Moto Z4, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z4. They have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Moto Z4 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto Z4 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a lot more megapixels back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photographs.
Moto Z4 features greater battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.