Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. Even being the best we compare here, it must be told that it's also somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little bit better display than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2960px resolution.
The Moto Z4 features much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z4. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Moto Z4 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 3430mAh. The Moto Z4 has a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto Z4 also has a larger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures.
Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.